People with larger social networks are better at predicting what someone will say but not how they will say it
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
What will they say? – Public Announcement Games
Dynamic epistemic logic describes the possible information-changing actions available to individual agents, and their knowledge preand post conditions. For example, public announcement logic describes actions in the form of public, truthful announcements. However, little research so far has considered describing and analysing rational choice between such actions, i.e., predicting what rational ...
متن کاملWhat will they say? - Public Announcement Games
Dynamic epistemic logics describe the epistemic consequences of actions. Public announcement logic, in particular, describe the consequences of public announcements. As such, these logics are descriptive – they describe what agents can do. In this paper we discuss what rational agents will or should do. We consider situations where each agent has a goal, a typically epistemic formula he or she ...
متن کاملIt's not what you say, but how you say it.
IRWA’s Communication/Acquisition Courses emphasize that successful right of way agents, when conducting an acquisition, listen far more than they talk and typically demonstrate exceptional listening skills. Scholars researching the field of human behavior and communication have concluded that the best negotiators, which would include the best right of way acquisition agents, not only have outst...
متن کاملCommunicating Microbiology Results. It’s Not Just What You Say, But How You Say It
959. Communicating Microbiology Results. It’s Not Just What You Say, But How You Say It Mary Musgrove, PharmD; Rachel M Kenney, PharmD; Ronald Kendall, PharmD; Robert Tibbetts, PhD D(ABMM), F(CCM); Linoj Samuel, PhD., D(ABMM); Mike Peters, PharmD, BCPS; Susan Davis, PharmD; Pharmacy, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Henry Ford Wyandotte Hospital, W...
متن کاملThinking about false belief: it's not just what children say, but how long it takes them to say it.
We examined 240 children's (3.5-, 4.5-, and 5.5-year-olds) latency to respond to questions on a battery of false-belief tasks. Response latencies exhibited a significant cross-over interaction as a function of age and response type (correct vs. incorrect). 3.5-year-olds'incorrect latencies were faster than their correct latencies, whereas the opposite pattern emerged for 4.5- and 5.5-year-olds....
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
سال: 2018
ISSN: 2327-3798,2327-3801
DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1508733